A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

B. On September 5, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for attempted larceny in the Daegu District Court Port Branch branch on September 5, 2016. On July 19, 2017, the same court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 7, 2018, at around 02:00, the Defendant opened a door-to-door 61* in the front parking lot of the C Apartment, and opened a door-to-door 3 vehicle owned by the victim D, which was parked therein, and entered the door-to-door 50,000 won and approximately KRW 3,000,00 in the market value of Samsung Samsung mobile phone jumt, which was in the victim’s possession in the robbbbbbox.

2. At around 03:00 on June 18, 2018, the Defendant opened a door that was parked at the above C Apartment 60*, and opened a door that was not corrected by the victim F, which was parked therein, and entered the door, with 21 set of jum jum jum jum jum jumt in the market price owned by the victim and was in contact jum jum jum jum.

3. On June 20, 2018, around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a door that was parked in the front parking lot of H apartment 40*, and entered a door that was not corrected by JM5 vehicle owned by the victim I and attempted to steals the goods owned by the victim; (b) but (c) did not discover any stolen objects, and thus did not commit an attempted crime.

4. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 3, tried to collect the property owned by the said victims by taking the hand on a LR-V vehicle owned by the victim K, a Nrara vehicle managed by the victim M, a P bargaining vehicle owned by the victimO, and a RR-V vehicle managed by the victim Q. However, the Defendant did not commit an attempted act because the vehicle’s door was corrected, even though the Defendant attempted to steal the property owned by the said victims.

As seen above, the Defendant habitually attempted to steals or steal the victims’ property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement against D and S.