1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Chief;

A. The status of the Plaintiff, the Defendants, and the interested parties is the wife of the network C. Defendant B is the children of the above network C. Nonparty D is the deceased of the case of E as seen below. Nonparty F is the wife of the above D. The Plaintiff paid the victim’s relief fund upon the application of the bereaved family relief fund by the above F.

B. On March 9, 2016, the network C established the occurrence of the incident and the liability for damages caused by the damage to the damage of the instant case, mixing the anti-toxic agrochemicals, which are highly toxic agrochemicals, with the small-scale disease located in the kimchi cooling house in the community hall, and killed the instant D as acute drug addiction.

Therefore, the network C is liable for all damages suffered by the above D due to the above tort.

C. Upon the above F’s application, the Plaintiff paid KRW 83,017,440 to the above F for the relief fund for crime victims.

Defendant A succeeded to the property of Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B, Defendant B succeeded to the 2/9 shares, Nonparty G and Nonparty G who are the remaining inheritors, and Nonparty H reported the inheritance limit approval to the family branch support of the Daegu District Court, and the said report was accepted on June 23, 2017.

(2017 Doz. 61).

Under Article 21(2) of the Crime Victim Protection Act, the State subrogates the beneficiary of the relief fund to claim compensation for damages within the scope of the relief fund paid by the State. As such, the Plaintiff claims against the Defendant A for payment of KRW 27,672,480 (i.e., KRW 83,017,440) (i.e., KRW 3/9 of the relief fund), KRW 18,448,320 (i., KRW 83,017,440) and damages for delay.

2. In comprehensively taking account of the descriptions, etc. of evidence Nos. 1 through 18 and evidence Nos. 8 through 18 (including paper numbers), it is difficult to readily conclude that the network C injected a Mea to a small subject matter located in the kimchi cooling house within the community center on March 9, 2016, thereby having reached the death of the said D, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge such facts.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is without merit without examining further claims.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff .