beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. On June 25, 2014, at around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) stated that “F” in front of “F” located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E; (b) the franch distance to the victim G (the age of 69) who was drinking together with the dong residents was “whether they have been drinking”; and (c) carried out a dispute with the victim, the Defendant: (a) took a bath for the victim; (b) carried the victim’s right arms; (c) carried the victim’s arms on his/her hand; and (d) carried the victim’s arms onto his/her right arms; and (d) carried the victim’s injury incurred in holeing
B. From August 26, 2014 to around 00:40 on the following day, the Defendant interfered with the business: (a) sent approximately one-hour singing at the victim I’s room No. 1 operated by the victim I in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) interfered with the victim’s singinging business by stating that the victim did not have any singing, that the victim “sing 20,000 won of the singing room paid in advance and talked with other women,” and that the Defendant interfered with the victim’s singing business by force to prevent customers from entering the singing room, such as continuing to the studs show.
C. Around September 21, 2014, the Defendant insultingd the Victim K at the “Lac shop” operated by the victim K located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul on September 13, 2014, and among numerous customers, including M et al., the Defendant provided the victim with the victim with the verbal dispute with the victim, and the victim said that “the victim was Chewing, dead, and Chewing,” and publicly insulting the victim K.
2. Defendant B (Interference with Business) from around 18:00 to 18:50, July 27, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s coffee business by force by preventing customers who had entered the coffee shop from entering the victim K from entering the coffee shop by having the disturbance, such as having the victim take a bath at the victim K as described in the above paragraph (a) (i). The Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by force.