logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.15 2017고단3200
자동차관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is designated as an inspector in charge of motor vehicle inspection at the E and the comprehensive inspection office of motor vehicles located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the E and the comprehensive inspection office of motor vehicles was designated by Incheon Metropolitan City on January 17, 2014 as a designated maintenance business operator who can conduct a comprehensive motor vehicle inspection.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 5, 2016, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act: (a) the chief prosecutor of the prosecutors’ office of the foregoing vehicle: (b) requested from the head of the prosecutors’ office of the vehicle to take a f G25 tons of grain transport vehicle from his name broker to request the Defendant not to take measures for re-verification or failure to pass the inspection, even if there is no iron cover for preventing the decline of the cargo; and (c) the inspection photographs sent to the system for reporting the national land’s data-processing without being exposed from the brogic inspection and sent to the system without being exposed from the brogic inspection, after adjusting the car broto so that they do not appear to cover the cover; (d) undergo a comprehensive inspection as if the said cargo vehicle’s structure and equipment are appropriate; (e) received KRW 90,000 in cash from the brogs; and (e) conducted a comprehensive inspection by the aforementioned method during the period from March 5, 2016 to September 20, 2016.

As a result, the Defendant illegally conducted a comprehensive motor vehicle inspection as an employee of the designated maintenance business entity who is designated to conduct a comprehensive motor vehicle inspection.

(b) No national technical qualification certificate for violating the Act shall be lent or lent to any other person, or shall arrange the lending;

Nevertheless, on February 25, 2016, the Defendant lent the qualification certificate for the automobile inspection industrial technician (number :H) which is a national technical qualification certificate that he/she acquired from B to meet the criteria for human resources possession and the criteria for comprehensive inspection at the above comprehensive inspection station of a motor vehicle around February 25, 2016, filed a false report to the competent authority, and then filed a false report to the inspector belonging to the E/automobile comprehensive inspection station from around that time to September 20, 2016.

arrow