beta
Text
The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000 (per million) if Defendant A did not pay the said fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2015 High 1319"
1. The motor vehicle inspection agent of the defendant A shall not perform the motor vehicle inspection unlawfully;
Nevertheless, on January 7, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision of passing the examination even though it has been installed a straw board in which Ddvanced Motor Vehicle Industrial Complex (Inspection Office) Co., Ltd., Ltd., 120, 5 times in Namdong-gu, Gwangju Mine-gu, Seoul, had been installed, which allows people to board and alight from the front side of the motor vehicle without obtaining approval from the head of the Si/Gun/Gu.
2. The Defendant is a company that runs the comprehensive repair business of motor vehicles and designated as a designated maintenance business entity for comprehensive inspections.
The above defendant A, who is an employee of the defendant, illegally inspected the automobile as above.
"2015 High Doz. 1663"
1. The motor vehicle inspection agent of the defendant A shall not perform the motor vehicle inspection unlawfully;
Nevertheless, on August 7, 2014, the Defendant prepared a comprehensive motor vehicle inspection report as legitimate, as the length of the body specifications is within 50 centimeters of the error range, even though approximately KRW 20-30 cm is attached to the behind the E-standard waste collection vehicle affiliated with the Geum-gu Corporation, the Defendant prepared a comprehensive motor vehicle inspection report, even if the length of the body specifications is within 50 cm.
The defendant, including this, denied the comprehensive inspection to the effect that it is appropriate for the 18 vehicles of which the length of the specifications is inappropriate by attaching a tag as shown in the attached list of crimes.
2. The Defendant is a company that runs the comprehensive repair business of motor vehicles and designated as a designated maintenance business entity for comprehensive inspections.
The above defendant A, who is an employee of the defendant, illegally inspected the automobile as above.
Summary of Evidence
. 2015 fixed 1319
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Each protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police officers against the Defendants
1. On-site control photographs, test results, motor vehicle registration ledgers, and motor vehicle specifications (Evidence Nos. 5, 8, 10, 12.