One year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor, and one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of No. 5 of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Busan District Court on July 7, 2016, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on August 4, 2016.

"2016 Gohap 415" and "2017 Gohap 85"

1. On August 2015, the Defendant, who violated the Act on Fraud, Attorney-at-law Violation and Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Criminal Proceeds, listens to the fact that he was detained by C as a drug incident at a place not exceeding Busan Franman (hereinafter referred to as "Sckman") in Busan and through C, the Defendant could be released at the first stage at the prosecutor's office in order for C to be released by the prosecutor of the Department of Department E in Busan and the prosecutor of the prosecutor's office.

When the victim D was indicted as it was ( August 26, 2015), her fluencing her to the effect that he/she would be released through the prosecution’s old sentence, etc., and the said victim remitted her amount of KRW 20 million to the Defendant on August 28, 2015. Ultimately, this part was determined as having the same meaning as the contents of the above indictment, and thus, did not separately revise this part by deeming that it was the same as the content of the above indictment.

The phrase “a request for KRW 50 million was made.” The phrase was false.

However, the defendant did not have any relationship with the prosecutor of Busan Prosecutors E division, but did not have any intention or ability to release the victim from the beginning.

On August 28, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 20 million from the victim to the national bank account in the name of F, which is the Defendant’s branch, and acquired it, and solicited the case handled by the public officials at the same time, and received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the case handled by the public officials, and in the indictment submitted by the public prosecutor, the Defendant pretended to receive money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the case handled by the public officials and receiving money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the case handled by the public officials.

“....”