A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

17,400,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2014, the Defendant received a request from the victim E to re-examine the case of application for adjudication which was rejected by the Gwangju High Court after filing a complaint at the hotel coffee shop located in C, and the Defendant requested that the Defendant be sentenced to a favorable judgment in the case of embezzlement for which the inside of the case is tried as the Defendant.”

The defendant, "A party executive member of the FIF Federation interest G party member of the FIF Federation, the chief prosecutor of the Seoul Central Prosecutor's Office, and the National Assembly Legal Affairs Committee, are aware of the case individually, so that the defendant will re-examine the case of the application for adjudication, and will be sentenced to a favorable judgment in the judgment of embezzlement case.

However, in order to promote the work by solicitation for them, the expenses need to be incurred.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to re-examine the case of application for adjudication in favor of the chief prosecutor of the Seoul Central Prosecutor's Office, the National Assembly members, etc. and to make the judgment favorable to the judgment of

The Defendant received KRW 5 million from the injured party on September 12, 2014 as the expense for solicitation of the instant case on or around September 12, 2014, and received a total of KRW 17,400,000 from around that time to October 21, 2014 in the same manner as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Form 4 in the same manner.

As a result, the Defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the case dealt with by public officials at the same time by deceiving the victim and receiving property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statements of E and H;

1. Details of I withdrawals;

1. The account number of a national bank under J-name is known;

1. A list of deposit of KRW 5 million on September 1, 2014;

1. Details of J account transactions;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant merely borrowed 17,400,000 won from the injured party under the pretext of a loan and did not receive it under the pretext of solicitation for a case handled by a public official by deceiving the injured party.