logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.28 2016고단288
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was dispatched to the “D” located in Sejong-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the instant company) as an employee of the “Pung Pung” that dispatched staff for cleaning and guarding services from March 2002 to October 2012, and served at the headquarters of the reserve forces in the instant company.

1. On July 23, 2012, the Defendant did not have the right to select a provider of cremation, etc. in this case. At the time, even if the Defendant bears the obligation of approximately KRW 20 million, the Defendant merely thought to make personal consumption, such as reimbursement of the said obligation, and did not have the victim intent or ability to deliver cremation, etc. to the instant company, the Defendant, who is the operator of the “F”, grants the right to receive delivery for cremation, tax settlement, etc., and send KRW 20 million as a bid deposit, to the Defendant, who is the operator of the “F”, with the F’s financial standing.

In other words, “Alongly,” a false statement was received 20,000,000 won from the victim’s account (G) in the name of the defendant, and acquired it through deception, and the victim acquired the total amount of KRW 80,000,000 on five occasions from around that time to October 1 of the same year, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. On October 10, 2012, the Defendant did not have the right to select the delivery company of cremation, etc. in this case, and at the same time, the Defendant was aware of personal consumption, such as reimbursement of the above obligation even if he was paid money from the victim H, and the victim did not have the intent or ability to have the victim deliver cremation, etc. to the company. The Defendant, an operator of the “I agency,” issued the victim, who was the operator of the “I agency, issued the direction that I would use I products because I would not be good for products used at the company, and want to confirm the agency’s financial status, stating that “The payment of KRW 35 million, which is 20% of the cost of the toilet goods, shall be made in advance from the victim on November 1 of the same month.”

arrow