beta
Text
Defendant
B Imprisonment for one year, and for defendant A, for six months.
However, this judgment is delivered to the defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B From July 2010 to October 201, 2013, a person working as the head of the external management team in charge of purchasing group 2 in the victim H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "victim Co., Ltd.") is a person working as the head of the external management team in charge of purchasing group, and the defendant A is a person working as the member of the victim Co., Ltd.'s procurement team from December 2009 to October 18, 2016.
1. Defendant B, upon establishing a business entity under the name of another person on March 2013, seeking profits by having the business entity selected and supplied as a supplier of the victim’s company, was aware of the fact, and was subject to disciplinary action on November 11, 2013, and thereafter, intended to directly establish “A” and supply goods to J Co., Ltd., but, in the process of examination for the registration of the supplier, the supply company could not be supplied because of its failure to register as a partner, the previous disciplinary action was rejected.
I think, I tried to attract money and valuables by threatening the management of the victim company.
A. Since the Defendant in occupational breach of trust is an employee working for the victim company as above, if he retires from the company, the employer of the company has a duty of care to return or discard documents, files, etc., which are major business assets produced by taking considerable time, effort, and expenses to the company.
However, on November 11, 2013, the Defendant violated his duties at the office of the Haju Operation Team located in Sinsi, Sinsi, Sinsi, and did not return and discard non-public data, such as the amount of transaction between the injured party and the partner, cost, company's business goals, etc., which included major business assets such as the amount of transaction between the injured party and the partner, cost, and company's business goals. The Defendant set the KPI goal in 13 years, attached to the 13 year, ‘KI', ’, ‘the estimated processing costs and proportion of each additional SP, ‘SMT', ‘S-2 QA forecast and ‘P', ‘A plan', which included in non-public output.
Accordingly, the defendant acquires property benefits equivalent to the value of the above materials and thereby the victim company.