The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the crime of forging each private document as stated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 67 of the crime committed in the separate sheet of crime in the judgment: Imprisonment with prison labor for two years; fabrication of each private document as listed in the separate sheet of crime Nos. 68 through 201 as stated in the judgment; fabrication of each private document as stated in the separate sheet of crime No. 68 through No. 201 as stated in the judgment; 2 years of suspended execution for six months; 3 months of imprisonment with prison labor) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, such as drinking, driving without a license, etc.

In particular, the Defendant committed the crime of forging the instant private document and the crime of uttering of the said investigation document during the period of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, which became final and conclusive, and the Defendant committed the crime of unlicensed driving of the instant case during the suspension of the execution of imprisonment due to drinking and unlicensed driving.

In full view of the various circumstances, including the above circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentencing of the lower court after the judgment, the sentencing of the lower court is not unfair.

3. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.