The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the judgment of the court which convicted the defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts, although the defendant did not have any false statement contrary to his memory after attending the court as a witness.

2. The lower court also asserted the same purport as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal, and the lower court rejected the foregoing assertion based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated, and found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged.

In light of the following circumstances revealed through the above evidence, i.e., ① the defendant in a de facto marital relationship with C, D is a person in a de facto marital relationship with F, and D was present on the trial date of January 20, 201 of the case, including the fabrication of official documents by the Suwon District Court, Ansan Branch, 201No. 3392, Jun. 20, 2012, ② the defendant was present at the court outside of the court at the time, and the defendant was in a position to have been able to have been present, ③ the injury that C was able to have been informed of D’s face in the Do, ③ the above fact that the defendant was able to have been present at the court of appeal, and the defendant was present at the court of appeal and testimony as stated in the facts charged in the above judgment, ④ the defendant's testimony and testimony at the court of appeal, and it is difficult to dismiss the credibility of the defendant's testimony and testimony at the court of appeal 14th of March 14, 2013.