The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles or misunderstanding the facts, although the defendant testified to the effect that he did not post the doctrine of the D church at the time of the testimony in this case, and that he did not make a false statement because he was not a person who was engaged in the three times or regularly attending the worship, and thus he did not make a false statement, the court below convicted the defendant of perjury.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (two years of suspended sentence in October) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On September 19, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the violation of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) against the aforementioned court No. 2014, 1083, 2014, and 1083, 2014.

When the defendant gives testimony that he is D, the defendant's "E" clothes, which the defendant's operation, are recognized as having d clothes, and is likely to be acquitted for C, so the defendant's false testimony contrary to memory for the purpose of making C unfavorable to C in the above case.

On September 19, 2014, the Defendant “A witness shall be required to authorize D new Dos” in the above court.

The question of the prosecutor’s “I not.”

Due to customers, I have given a few guidances.

It is necessary to give testimony as "the purpose of the written complaint of a witness is that the witness was not a Dson."

“I did not have any example, D, but have given several answers to the questions of the defense counsel.”

“The testimony was made.”

However, the defendant was a DNA member at the time of his testimony.

As a result, the defendant made a false statement with the intent to harm the defendant C, who is the defendant, in relation to the above criminal case.

B. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant is not D, and the defendant does not make a false statement in court.