logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.05.19 2017고정288
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving the B-learning passenger car.

1. On November 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a frighting car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.170% from the 1km section of blood transfusion to the 139 Eup/Myeon in the same Dondong-gun, Seoyang-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do, the Donsan-gun, the Donsan-gun, the Donsan-gun, the Donsan-gun, and the Dondong-gun, the same Donyang-do Eup/Myeonn-gun, the Don-gun, the Don-don-gun

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after an accident) committed an act in the same manner as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant driven the said maternal car and proceeded to turn to the left, in violation of the signal signal from the right side of the speech-gu Eup office of the Seoyang-gu, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do, to the left at the distance of the 161 e-ro, Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do.

At all times, since it is a private-distance intersection that is operated normally by signal lights, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to make a left-hand turn in violation of the signal while under the influence of alcohol, and received a part of the Rad-car driving ahead of the left-hand part of the Rad-hand car driving by the victim C, who is placed in a gold and French cafeteria from the side of the lad-car cafeteria to the ludular cafeteria, following the right-hand part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the defendant damaged the repair cost equivalent to 500,000 won through the exchange of all the above damaged vehicles by occupational negligence.

In such a case, the driver immediately stopped and took necessary measures such as the removal and prevention of traffic hazards and obstacles, but left the site without taking any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, an accident scene photograph, and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Inquiries about the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and estimates;

1.The application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of internal investigation reports.

arrow