logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.17 2017가합538662
공탁금 출급청구권 확인
Text

1. E, May 29, 2017, deposited by the Seoul Central District Court No. 10499, May 29, 2017 449,650

Reasons

. As to the honorable treatment, the following resolution was adopted:

(hereinafter referred to as “the honorable treatment resolution of this case”). (2) The defendant, who was delegated by the plaintiff, as a member of the Council, intends to dump the defendant to dump the plaintiff’s original dump of the plaintiff's original dump of the plaintiff, for not less than 20 years in Korea branch church and to dump the plaintiff's original dump of the plaintiff pursuant to Article 27 (7) of the Constitution.

The consent to receive the agenda of the political party's resolution for the senior pastor and the number of members present shall be the number of stuffed persons.

(3) A case pertaining to honorable treatment for log trees ① To purchase a housing unit (one unit of a house to the Defendant, who is a log tree), the Plaintiff’s housing unit as security was financed by KRW 500,000,000, and the Plaintiff’s housing unit as long as it was provided as two years from June 2015 to May 2017, and the Defendant would purchase the housing after two years.

(2) Two bankbooks and 60,000 won in advance, which are entered as installment savings preparation for retirement, shall be rarely paid.

* 1: 65,00,000 won * 2: 149,00,000 won * 60,000 won : 60,000 won : 60,000 won ; 30,000 won per month; 4,500,000 won per month for living expenses; but (1) 4,50,000 won per month for the members of the political party by re-requesting the consent of all the members of the political party to make a change, with a thickness of 4,50,000 won.

For the honorable treatment of deep-age pastors, consent to receive housing cases, consolation money, and living expenses as a resolution of the party council and receive all stuffs.

5 The Plaintiff paid the interest on the instant loan and the management expenses of the instant apartment.

C. According to the above facts, the plaintiff entered into the lease contract of this case in order to establish a place where the defendant is residing in accordance with the resolution of honorable treatment of this case and paid 500,000,000 won to E, so the lessee is indicated as the defendant in the lease contract of this case.

However, as seen earlier, Paragraph 5 of this case’s lease agreement is stipulated.

arrow