Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the same shall apply for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant B was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with labor for a crime of violating road traffic law at the Seoul Central District Court on August 12, 2015, and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on August 20, 2015, and is currently under suspended execution.

[Criminal facts] From February 23:00 on February 11, 2016 to a high school-friendly job offers, EF and alcohol, and around 03:30 on the 12th of the same month, the Defendants went to a “H” telecom in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for accommodation.

At that place, Defendant A is entitled to engage in sexual traffic for the victim I (35) who is an employee of the above telecom.

“Isson,” with the purport of “Isson from the injured party”

In this regard, the victim was seriously able to take care of the rebuttal, and the victim rejected the victim from lodging in the above telecom.

After that, at around 04:45 on the same day, the Defendants were found to be the above telecom and asked for a room, but they were re-feasted for the reason that there was no room from the injured party.

Therefore, the Defendants will throw away from the brush "Choe".

“A while taking a bath, etc., Defendant B threatened the victim with Belgium and tree booms on the said burgator as if they were caught by the victim. Defendant B was placed on the victim’s face at the victim’s face, Defendant A was gathering plastic transit and burging burgs, etc., wherein the burgs in the said burgs are placed on the said burgator, and Defendant A was gathering the victim’s burgs, etc., wherein the burgs in hand were placed on the victim’s face. Defendant A was furged by burging the burgs into the said burg.

Therefore, the Defendants conspired with the victim for about four weeks of medical treatment, resulting in injury, such as the cutting of the pelto, damage to the pelto, etc. of the pelto.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Images and photographs of USB;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of seizure records and written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendants shall choose the applicable law and punishment for criminal facts.