The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. One-string, although it appears that the defendant recognized his mistake and against it, and the defendant committed the crime of this case by contingently, all of these circumstances were considered in the original judgment. The crime of this case committed by the defendant was committed by the defendant, without any particular reason, by destroying public water at the police station without any specific reason, and then destroying the police officer who was working there again at the same police station after five days thereafter, and causing an injury to the police officer who was working there at the same police station, and then, after five days thereafter, he did so. The habit of the crime was peeped, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for more than five million won due to the same kind of crime, and around 2006, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won due to the same crime, and other records related to the crime of this case, the circumstances and contents of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, the defendant's environment, character, behavior, occupation, and occupation, etc., do not seem to be too unfair balancing.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.