logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.10.16 2013고단1714
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:30 on November 14, 2013, the Defendant appeared in Jeju District Court No. 202, which was moving on Jeju Island, as a witness for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) against C in the Jeju District Court No. 202, and took an oath. In fact, C testified as “(C)” to the attorney’s question, “(D) for driving on the Poter under the influence of alcohol on July 13, 2013, although C driven the Poter under the influence of alcohol on July 18:50, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A copy of the report on the state of driving under the influence of alcohol, and a copy of the report made; and

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witness to E and A;

1. A copy of each fact-finding inquiry report - The Defendant, at the park on July 13, 2013, was driving the Poter Cargo (hereinafter “instant truck”) at the request of the Defendant, and was leaving the instant truck in the vicinity of the D shop located in Jeju. Thus, the Defendant asserted that, in the instant case of violation of the Road Traffic Act (No. 2013 high-level 608, Jeju District Court) against C, as a witness, “the Defendant stated that he had driven the instant truck at the time” did not make any false statement.

Meanwhile, in this Court also, C is a witness, and in the case of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking City) with respect to the witness, as the defendant, the police officer, who was sent to the Defendant by the report of any of the instant cargo vehicles, demanded to take a drinking test on the ground of drinking alcohol, and responded to the demand of any of the police officers, who were sent to the Defendant by the report of any of the instant cargo vehicles, on the ground of drinking alcohol, on the ground that he was able to take a telephone contact with the Defendant, and that he was in a state of drinking, he was in a state of drinking, and that he was in a state of drinking, and that he was in a state of drinking, and that he was in a state of drinking with the Defendant, and that he was in the family.

arrow