logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고단678
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On April 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with the performance of official duties in the credit support of the Suwon, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Suwon detention center on July 6, 2015.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On February 28, 2017, at the Esing room operated by the victim D (Woo, 48 years old) of the victim D of the third floor in Changwon-si, Changwon-si on February 28, 2017, the Defendant, who interfered with his/her duties, would reduce the amount of alcohol to KRW 380,000,000,000 for the victim’s “after drinking alcohol together with his/her day-to day-day, the Defendant would have reduced the amount of alcohol to the victim.”

“ even though I am the horses, I amba, I amba, I amba, I amba, I amba.

L. L. L. H. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. gas.

“ and I expressed a bath.”

The defendant continued to have the victim go beyond the floor by scaming on one occasion with scam of the victim, scambling the victim, intending to collect CCTV monitors, and scam for about 15 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 위 일시 및 장소에서, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 창원 서부 경찰서 F 지구대 경찰관인 G(35 세, 경장) 등이 피해 경위를 듣고 있는 가운데, “ 짭새 새끼들.” 등의 욕설을 하며 G의 팔을 잡아당겼다.

피고 인은 위 G로부터 제지를 받았음에도 계속하여 “야 이 개새끼들 아. 니들이 짭새면 다가.” 등의 욕설을 하며 G의 팔을 잡아당기고 양손으로 G의 머리채를 잡아 흔들어 폭행하였다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. A photograph of a closure;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (the criminal defendant's repeated offense, and current status of individual confinement);

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment (the point of interference with business).

arrow