The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the summary of the grounds for appeal F, B’s statement, the photograph of the track driven by the defendant immediately after the accident, etc., although it is sufficient to recognize the fact that the traffic accident of this case occurred due to the defendant’s negligence, as shown in the facts charged in this case, the court below acquitted the defendant, who erred by mistake

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below is that (1) the road of this case is speeded 60km/h, and F was driving a truck at the speed of 72.1 to 74.1km/h at the time of the accident; (2) the track of this case is the highest speed of 20 km/h, and it seems that at the time of the accident, it would have been very high to open the road of this case to the road of this case according to the slope of 25 % at the time, and (3) the F was found to have discovered and carried the track of this case before the point of accident. According to the speed at the time of the truck of this case, it is difficult to view that the above truck of this case was a truck of this case at the time of the above 30 km and it was hard to see that it was a collision with the road of this case because it was about about 1.5 seconds at the time of the accident, and it was very difficult for the driver of this case to enter the road of this case to the extent that it was a collision with the road of this case.