(영문) 청주지방법원 2012.04.06 2011고단2297

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2012.04.06 2011고단2297

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 10:45 on August 29, 201, the Defendant: (a) driven a D Trackter, and tried to enter the road of the first line in the Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, bypassing from the Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, the Cheongcheon-do, the Cheongcheon-do, the Cheongcheon-do, the Cheongcheon-do, the principle of Cheongcheon-do. In such a case, the Defendant: (b) had a duty of care to enter the road to be entered with the safety of the road intended to enter; (c) but he had a duty of care to enter the road after making it possible for the person engaged in driving such a duty of care to enter the road. However, at around September 14, 2011, the Defendant caused the death of the victim G (the 67 years of age) who was on board the Cheongcheon-do, the front right side of the Hack-do, which was driven by the Cheongcheon-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made by the witness E, I and J in compliance with this Court;

1. Each statement made in compliance with the protocol of examination of the witness in relation to the K, L, and I of this Court;

1. Any statement made to the effect that the protocol of inspection of this court is appropriate;

1. Statement made in compliance with the statement of E prepared by the assistant judicial police officer;

1. Determination as to the assertion by a defendant and his/her defense counsel on the traffic accident report (the actual condition investigation report), each photograph, and death certificate

1. The main point of the argument is that the traffic accident of this case was shocked by the E-driving pressle vehicle, where the defendant, while driving the Trackter while driving the Trackter, was stopped at the edge of the road to enter the road from the e-road to the road, and the defendant neglected the duty of e-motor vehicle driving while neglecting the duty of lacing on the edge of the road.

In addition, the fact-finding report prepared in relation to the traffic accident of this case is not prepared on the basis of the field situation immediately after the accident, but only a photograph taken immediately after the accident is destroyed due to the moving of the track after the accident.

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2013.01.10 2012노376

-광주지방법원 2012.11.20 2012고단4583

-청주지방법원 2015.09.07 2015고단1034

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.22 2019나70720

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.05.18 2017고단256