The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the accident of this case is not that of the victim's vehicle during the change of the vehicle line, but it was intended for the victim to obstruct the change of the vehicle of the defendant by raising the speed of the vehicle even when the vehicle of the defendant was actually completed the change of the vehicle line, and the defendant continued to commit the crime of escape because it was erroneous that the victim was able to scam with the victim by reporting that the vehicle of this case was scambling the victim's scam

2. The court below acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. ① The victim stated to the effect that the vehicle of the defendant was rapidly changed from the investigative agency to the court below to the right-hand side without using the direction direction, etc., and the defendant's statement of F and G, which is a police officer investigating the accident of this case, is consistent with this (the victim's statement cannot be trusted by the victim's statement in light of the fact that the victim stated two conflicts at the time of the accident at the court below, but the above circumstance alone is insufficient to dismiss the credibility of the victim's statement). ② The victim's statement was damaged by the front wheel top of the front wheel of the victim's statement. The victim's statement was supported by the victim's statement that the defendant's vehicle was rapidly changed from the right-hand side of the victim's vehicle at the time of the collision, ③ the defendant's vehicle was damaged by the victim's mistake or the change of the victim's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's direction.