beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;
2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 201, 201, the Defendant forged a private document by means of a computer at D offices located in G offices located in G offices located in the wife population C, which were located in the Gyeonggi-si, Chungcheongnam-si, G apartment 1817, security deposit: KRW 150 million: 150 million, remainder: KRW 150 million: 140 million, lessor: F, G, lessee: F, and broker: H real estate in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and the I’s name was affixed to F’s name, as F’s seal.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one of the apartment lease contracts in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. On January 31, 201, the Defendant: (a) presented a false apartment charter contract to an attorney-at-law who is aware of the forgery in the course of obtaining a certificate at a law firm Tae-ro 114, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, by presenting the forged apartment charter contract as a document that was duly formed, as prescribed in paragraph (1).
3. On January 1, 2011, the Defendant: (a) in a non-fresh restaurant located in the building of the LGT Commission in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) provided the Victim J with the loan of KRW 25 million to China, not later than February 18, 2011; (c) provided, “If the loan is not made, the Defendant would waive the deposit of KRW 150 million for the lease of the E Apartment-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu; (d) provided, “If the loan is not made, the Defendant would waive the deposit of KRW 1550 million; and (e) provided, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) in order to have the victim believe it, presented a forged apartment lease contract to the victim as described in paragraph (1); and (e) prepared and certified a letter of waiver of the deposit for the lease.
However, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and there was no business entity operated other than the above business, and the above E Apartment 1817 entered into a lease contract with a deposit of KRW 155 million.