beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, and B jointly and severally, KRW 15,211,972, and Defendant D, jointly and severally with the above Defendants, 5,070.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties Nonparty C is a person who received surgery and treatment at the Seoul Asan Hospital (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”) operated by the Plaintiff, and the Defendants are C’s children.
B. Around April 27, 2011, the Plaintiff hospital’s surgery and treatment process (1) had been conducted after being diagnosed by the flag’s flag in the Plaintiff hospital at the Plaintiff Hospital at the Seoul National University Hospital at around 1997. Around April 27, 2011, the Plaintiff hospital was diagnosed by the flag’s flag’s hair, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the flag’s heart, and the Plaintiff’s hospital was diagnosed by the flag’s heart to undergo an operation to treat this. As a result, the Plaintiff’s diagnosis was determined to undergo an operation to undergo the treatment of the flag’s heart flag’s flag in the heart.
(2) On May 8, 2011, C hospitalized the Plaintiff hospital’s chest X, and Defendant A and B jointly and severally guaranteed the Plaintiff hospital’s obligation for medical expenses, such as the admission fee, etc.
(3) From around 17:18 on May 9, 201 to 21:59 on the same day, C received from the medical personnel of the Plaintiff hospital “satisfying marcule and satisfying marcing, tricheon-maloculing, and marcing operations (the operation of the heart of this case),” and transferred from the medical personnel of the Plaintiff hospital to the middle patient room on the same day at around 2:10 on the same day.
(4) After the completion of the instant heart surgery, from around 22:00 on May 9, 201 to 22:45 on the same day, the Plaintiff hospital’s medical personnel determined to perform the surgery for sacrine transfusion at around 23:00 on the same day, and performed the sacrine surgery (hereinafter “the instant sacrine surgery”) from around 23:15 to October 17 of the same month.
(5) On June 26, 201, at around 02:30, while being hospitalized in the Plaintiff Hospital’s intermediate patient room, C continued to run a pleination surgery (hereinafter “instant pleination”). The medical personnel of the Plaintiff Hospital continued to run a pleination surgery (hereinafter “instant pleination”). In this process, C is discarded.