1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

. The registration of ownership transfer was completed as a result;

3) With respect to the instant sales contract on June 22, 2007, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) KRW 1,200,000,000,000,000,000, which are indicated in the instant sales contract, in the case where the Plaintiff and the Defendant light the real estate price payment certificate prior to the location of the real estate as follows:

1. The amount of KRW 450,000,000 ( KRW 450,00,000) for the disposal of liabilities of the Korea Venture Mutual Savings and Finance Company;

2. The debt settlement of E and two other Busan (250,000,000 won).

3. Daily deposit in the F passbook (10,000,000 won).

4. Daily deposit in the F passbook (10,000,000 won).

5. Deduction of public service fees from two million won (20,000,000 won).

6. Cash payment (checks, eight thousand won) of KRW 400,000 (40,000,000).

7. Daily sugar (10,000,000 won) with interest paid in advance;

8. Balance (the conversion into security deposit) 0,000 won (50,000,000).

9. The total sum of KRW 1,200,000 ( KRW 1,200,000)* The eight balance is converted to the deposit for the deposit for the lease of a deposit with the payment in cash as of the date of the directors if the directors take place six months after the conversion into the deposit for the lease of a deposit for the lease of a deposit for the lease of a deposit * The two parties recognize that there is no frame for the above matters * The two parties written a written confirmation of the payment of the amount to be signed between each other (hereinafter referred to as the “instant confirmation”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including branch numbers for those with branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

B. The gist of the parties’ assertion argues that the Plaintiff was liable to pay the remainder of KRW 300 million to the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff received only KRW 1.2 billion from the Defendant, on the grounds that the purchase price of the instant sales contract was KRW 1.5 billion.

As to this, the Defendant paid the sales amount of KRW 1.2 billion, and even if it did not pay KRW 300 million out of the sales amount as alleged by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s remaining claim for the remainder of the sales amount is due to the completion of prescription.