1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant”) whose representative director is Defendant C on the ground of sale and purchase of the instant real estate.

The amount indicated in a real estate sales contract (1,200,000,000 won) other than D, in the light of the area south of the location of the real estate, shall be KRW 1,200,000.

1. The amount of KRW 450,000,000 ( KRW 450,00,000) for the liquidation of the liabilities of the Korea Exchange and Finance Company;

2. Two hundred million won (250,000,000 won) for the liquidation of liabilities in Busan, two persons other than E.

3. Daily deposit in the F passbook (10,000,000 won).

4. Daily deposit in the F passbook (10,000,000 won).

5. Deduction of public service fees from two million won (20,000,000 won).

6. Cash payment (checks, eight thousand won) of KRW 400,000 (40,000,000).

7. Daily sugar (10,000,000 won) with interest paid in advance;

8. Balance (the conversion into security deposit) 0,000 won (50,000,000).

9. The 1,200,000 won (1,200,000 won)* The balance No. 8 remains after the conversion into the deposit f.o.m. to the deposit f.m., the date of the directors if the directors take place six months after the conversion f.m.* The mutual recognition that the above matters are not true f.m. * Any civil or criminal issues are not raised due to the above f.m., sign between each other.

C. On June 22, 2007, the Plaintiff and Defendant C drafted a certificate of payment of real estate price as follows with respect to the payment of the purchase price of the instant sales contract.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the sales price of the instant sales contract was KRW 1.5 billion, and the Defendant received only KRW 1.2 billion from the Defendant, and that the Defendant is obligated to pay the remainder of KRW 300 million to the Plaintiff.

As long as the establishment of a disposal document is recognized as authentic, the court shall recognize the existence and content of the declaration of intent in accordance with the language and text stated in the disposal document, unless there is any clear and acceptable reflective evidence that denies the contents of the statement (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Da6753, Jun. 11, 2002).