logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.08.10 2015가합70938
토지인도
Text

1. Defendant F, G, H, and K own the Plaintiff’s “Defendants of [Attachment 1] Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6 of [Attachment 1] Land Lease Status.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff: Provided, however, the Plaintiff entered into a land lease agreement No. 2 No. 3 of the Attached Land Lease Status, with the network N, but Defendant G, the heir of the Plaintiff, succeeded to the status of the lessee under the above contract as the Plaintiff died on June 3, 2009.

Between Section B, the Plaintiff-owned Lriri (hereinafter “Lri”) and Mri (hereinafter “Mri”) had concluded and renewed a lease agreement for the purpose of owning a building (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) as shown in the table of the current status of land lease in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) with respect to each of the lands listed in the “land lease object” in attached Table 1, as indicated in the same table. The Defendants delivered each of the instant lands to the Defendants. The Defendants owned each of the above lands on the same ground as indicated in the “building owned by the Defendants.”

B. The Plaintiff increased the number of vehicles as indicated in the “increased rent” column in the attached Table 1 of the land lease status table to the Defendants, and the Defendants did not fully pay the difference corresponding to the period indicated in the “annual period” column in the same Table.

On the other hand, the result of the court's entrustment to the appraiser's appraiser's appraisal based on the actual status of each of the lands of this case is as stated in the "court's appraisal" column of the above table.

(hereinafter referred to as "court appraisal"). (c)

On January 6, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the termination of each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds of two or more occasions of delinquency, and each of the above notification reached Defendant F, H, I, and K on January 7, 2015, respectively, and Defendant G on January 8, 2015.

In addition, the Plaintiff sent to Defendant J an application for modification of the purport of the instant claim and the cause of the claim, which contains a declaration of intent to terminate the lease agreement on the grounds that Defendant J was in arrears for at least two years after the end of 2014, and the said application was served on March 17, 2017.

(hereinafter “each termination notice of this case”) on the other hand except Defendant K.

arrow