The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant was a business president in charge of obtaining orders from the Corporation and managing the construction site in C (State).

On March 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the F office operated by the victim E in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D D Building, the Defendant concluded a construction contract with the victim for the construction of the first underground floor and the second floor on the ground (hereinafter “instant construction”) to the Gyeonggi-si G with the victim; (b) the total construction cost of KRW 990,000,000,000; (c) the construction period from April 8, 2014 to October 31, 2014; (d) the down payment (10% of the total construction cost) was paid on the date of the contract; and (e) the intermediate payment (85% of the total construction cost) was paid on the completion of each construction work; and (e) the remainder (5% of the total construction cost) was determined to be paid after obtaining approval for the use.

However, the Defendant, from September 2013 to September 3, 2013, managed the construction site around February 2014 while running multi-household housing construction in Gyeonggi-si H (hereinafter “H construction”) in the name of Gyeonggi-gu.

I used 50 million won with the marriage fund, and received the payment of the construction price for the G site from the injured party due to the relationship where the construction cost has been insufficient, such as the occurrence of additional construction cost of KRW 150 million, the victim did not have the intent or ability to construct the building properly within the agreed time limit because he did not intend to use the most of the transferred construction site exclusively for the above H construction site, except for the material cost directly paid in C (State).

On April 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) transferred KRW 99,00,000,000 as the down payment; and (c) KRW 44,00,00 as the construction cost of the additional civil works; and (b) KRW 218,232,540 as the primary gold, to the account of the name of the bank account of the name of C (State).

B. Around May 2, 2014, the Defendant filed a claim with the victim for KRW 118,800,000 under the name of the second gold, but the victim demanded that the details of the first gold use be the shipment. As such, the Defendant around May 9, 2014.