logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.01.16 2016고단2292
사기
Text

The crime No. 1 to 5 of the crimes set forth in the [Attachment No. 2] No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant is sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment, and No. 1 of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2010, the Defendant is a person who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud and a suspended sentence of two years on April 10, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 10, 201.

Basic Facts

On July 14, 2009, the Defendant established a trade wholesale and retail company under the trade name “B,” and imported and sold the clothing, shoes, and bags of sports brand such as Adidias.

When the Defendant purchases 720 million won at the age limit owned by the Defendant to the victim as a clothing retail businessman, the Defendant would allow the victim to receive money in excess of 50 million won by selling 4,58.10 won at the age limit owned by the Defendant.

In accordance with the proposal, the victim entered into a provisional sales contract with the victim and entered the bags in the logistics warehouse designated by the victim, and 4,5810,000 won was received from the victim.

Since July 16, 2009, the Defendant sold 600 bags from around July 16, 2009 to April 20, 2010, and deposited 48.9 million won to the victim.

Criminal facts

1. The defendant who acquired by deceptioning 7,635,00 won at the age limit of 1,200 won at the market price of 7,635,00 won;

D The request for return due to a new defect and the return of the price were required by D, but it was not paid with the money to be repaid, but with a view to returning the substitute at the age of the victim, instead of paying the new price.

On April 20, 2010, the Defendant told the above victim that “The above victim will immediately deposit the proceeds in the retail company in the store located in the Gyeonggi-si.”

However, even if the defendant was asked by the injured party, he thought that he would repay the defendant's obligation to the injured party, and sold it, and there was no intention to pay it to the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and raises the victim's age around that time.

arrow