The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a two-year imprisonment without prison labor) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime and is against the Defendant.

Some damages have been paid to the bereaved family members of the victim through insurance purchased by the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is very serious negligence of the defendant because the defendant entered the intersection by disregarding the stop signal, and conflicts with the victim's Obane by the signals.

Due to this case, the result of the victim's death was not observed.

The defendant did not reach an agreement with the bereaved family members of the victim, and the bereaved family members of the victim want to punish the defendant.

In addition, even if the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments are considered, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.