The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment without prison labor) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime and is against the Defendant.

It seems that part of the damage compensation has been made to the bereaved family members of the victim through insurance purchased by the defendant.

Meanwhile, the instant crime is difficult to view that the Defendant’s negligence after the shock of the vehicle caused the death of the victim by driving the victim over the road with the front and front wheels of the vehicle, which failed to accurately manipulate the brake system within the apartment complex.

Due to this case, the death of the victim was caused by the result.

The defendant did not reach an agreement with the bereaved family members of the victim, and the bereaved family members of the victim want to punish the defendant.

In addition, even if the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments are considered, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.