logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.11.13 2013고단2149
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The evidence seized shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 22, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Daegu District Court on February 22, 201, and was not a person who completed the execution of the sentence on April 14, 201.

"2013 Highest 2149"

1. On March 2013, 2013, the Defendant purchased and sold approximately 0.5g of 40,000 won to D, a psychotropic drug, a psychotropic drug, in the PC room in which it is impossible to identify the trade name near Suwon-gu, Busan.

2. On March 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) inserted approximately 0.15g of philophones purchased, as described in paragraph (1), into a single-use injection machine; (b) injected and dilution them; and (c) administered clophones on a total of five occasions from around the time to June 16, 2013, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from around the time of injection to June 16, 2013.

3. Around 15:00 on June 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) transferred KRW 400,000 to D; (b) obtained delivery of approximately 0.5 gramphones as express cargo from the Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central-gu, and traded them.

4. At around 20:20 on June 18, 2013, the Defendant kept approximately 0.2g of the penphones purchased from Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F4, as described in paragraph 3, in a manner of hiding them in a mobile phone gambling room.

"2013 High-class 2168" reported loans to a financial institution in a normal way, such as a person who is not able to obtain a loan from a financial institution in his/her own credit condition, a loan brokerage office operated by G, and sent a phone to the loan brokerage office operated by G, and sought an explanation from G and its employees that a loan can be made at a bank if he/she considers that the defendant would have made a deposit for the first house of H, the husband of H, and that he/she would receive a loan for the second-class loan in collusion with G, etc.

The defendant around May 3, 201 is the victim Nonghyup-dong around Kimhae-si.

arrow