logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.03.18 2015고단524
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On September 25, 2014, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to 8 months of imprisonment due to the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and decided on October 3, 2014.

1. The Defendants: (a) conspired with the victim’s co-property damage to the victim E-management located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with a focus on the fact that the parking lot for the victim E management was owned by others; and (b) illegally changing the form and quality of the parking lot; and (c) conspired with the victim with the intent

Defendant

A around 13:00 on April 23, 2014, at the container office located in the above parking lot, the Defendant B heard the victim’s phrase “I am “I am to operate the said parking lot, I am to have the knife the knife and get the knife all the vehicles inside the knife,” and “I am to have the knife the knife, I am to have the knife the knife, I cannot get the knife from the knife?? I am to have the knife? I am to have the knife the knife?? I am to have the knife the knife knife knife knif on the floor.”

As a result, the Defendants jointly damaged the market price of the victim's own glass and coffee.

2. From 15:00 to 17:00 at the end of April 2014, Defendant A conspired with F, G, H, and I to interfere with the victim’s parking lot business in collusion with the circumstances set forth in the preceding paragraph, and F, G, H, and I set a low-income vehicle at the entrance of the parking lot to prevent the entrance of the vehicle at the entrance of the parking lot, and G, H, and I prevented other vehicles from entering the parking lot.

The Defendant stated the phone number of the driver of the parked freight vehicle, and called “the driver is returned the parking fee from E and deducted the vehicle from the parking lot.”

Accordingly, in collusion with F, G, H, and I, the Defendant interfered with the victim's parking lot business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.

arrow