logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.27 2017노1538
업무방해등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was waiting the victim C to run the instant parking lot on the road outside the said parking lot after hearing the word that the instant parking lot was in full condition, and did not interfere with the operation of the parking lot by obstructing the passage of other vehicles in the instant parking lot.

B. The Defendant only left the victim’s arms once, and did not commit an assault by cutting the victim’s arms on several occasions.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances are acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the court below. In other words, the victim, at the investigative agency and the court below, stated that the instant parking lot was parked in another place because the Defendant did not have any other parking place. However, the Defendant did not have any other parking place, but did not withdraw two prices for the vehicle where the instant parking lot was located.

Even if the two prices of the above vehicles are parked, it was not possible to receive the defendant's vehicle because the two vehicles already parked temporarily in the parking lot were parked on the parking lot.

However, the Defendant: “I am the president, I am off, I am off. I am off the vehicle anywhere in the employee’s subject; left his vehicle at the entrance of the parking lot; and there was a police police by getting other vehicles going beyond 20 minutes to get off the vehicle.

"A consistent statement to the purport of this case, the CCTV image at the time of this case conforms to the above statement of the victim, and the police who received a report of interference with traffic due to the defendant's act is called out, and when the defendant himself intends to enter the instant parking lot, the victim cannot park his vehicle due to the fact that the instant parking lot is only the vehicle in the present parking lot."

In full view of the fact that the Defendant recognized the horses, the Defendant is a vehicle in the parking lot.

arrow