beta
Cases
2017Do1057 Evidence of perjury
Defendant
A person shall be appointed.
Appellant
Defendant
Defense Counsel
Law Firm B
Attorney C, EA, ED, EB, EEC
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016No1938 Decided December 23, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
May 17, 2017
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on abuse of authority
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices FININ et al.
Chief Justice 1 of the District Court
Justices Park Young-young
Justices Kim Jae-in