logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.17 2020고단4357
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving freight B and B.

On May 2, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 16:40 on May 2, 202, and proceeded along the two-lane, which is the left-hand turn from the distribution channel of Seocho-gu Seoul, according to the distribution channel of Seocho-gu, Seoul, and turned to the opposite line.

However, since the distribution distance is the section in which a U.S. is not permitted, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the distribution distance signals and to drive the motor vehicle at a place where a U.S. can be used.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left at the right edge of the victim C (Nam, 36 years old) driving on the two-lanes due to the negligence of making the U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S., U.S.

The Defendant, by these occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E (n, 20 years old), the same F (n, 51 years old), the same G (n, 19 years old), the same H (n, 30 years old), and I (n, South, 37 years old), such as dump, tension, etc. of cryp, in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered injury to the victimJ (n, South, and 40 years old), who is a bus passenger, such as dump, dump, tension, etc. of the bones, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of C;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was committed by the defendant while driving a vehicle, resulting in injury to the victims by shocking the damaged vehicle due to the signal violation.

arrow