logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2020.02.13 2019고합282
강간등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 7, 2017, the Defendant was released from parole by a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for special injury, etc. at the High Court for Armed Forces on April 25, 2018.

1. The Defendant damaged property at around 01:00 on March 3, 2019, the Defendant broken down a string in the inside room on the ground that the victim D (Woo, 24 years old), who was in the fore part of the victim D, who was in the fore part of the G apartment in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and that the victim said that he was the fore part of the victim.

2. On April 2019, at around 16:00, the Defendant received KRW 400,00 from the victim, “F” department stores of “F” in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, with the intention or ability to repay the money to the victim, even though the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money to the victim, the Defendant was provided with KRW 40,000 from the victim.”

3. The Defendant causing property damage, at around 02:0 on April 2019, at around 02:00, indicated in paragraph (1) at the place, and during the victim’s verbal dispute with the victim, the fact of opphones worth approximately KRW 1,400,000 in the market price is indicated as opphone XX, but it is unclear whether the victim is a dead flag or dead, and thus, it is specified as opphones only.

One set of the seeds shall be cut off to the floor, and they shall be broken up.

4. On June 2019, the Defendant violated the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (refluence) demanded that the victim “not wanting to be punished” was made in relation to the case of property damage under the victim’s report at the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Building and the victim’s residence, Seoul Central District Court 2019 High Court Decision 2019 High Court Decision 13306, which was prosecuted by the victim’s report, but the victim refused the request, stating that “I see how the police would be at any time any more reported. I see how I see the victim’s face. I see the victim’s face in drinking, and the victim’s neck is cut down by hand, thereby assaulting the victim for the purpose of cancelling the complaint in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

5...

arrow