Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2014, around 22:00, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E (manam, 54 years of age) who was the complainant for reasons of fire within the D week located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as “the victim E (math, 54 years of age)”, and “the victim shall be replaced by the flag, the flag, the flag, the flag, and the Domine flag,” while the majority of F et al. observe.

Summary of Evidence

1. The part concerning the statement that the defendant stated that "the victim's partial statement in court" should be changed

1. The statement recorded on the third public trial by the witness E and F, respectively; and

1. A statement recorded on April 28, 2015 by a witness G at a place other than the trial date of the witness G;

1. A complaint stating that there was no fact that the defendant made a statement as stated in the ruling, although the defendant and his defense counsel made the statement "to open". However, in full view of the statements of the victim, witness F and G, the fact that the defendant made a statement as stated in the ruling can be sufficiently recognized. Accordingly, the above argument is not acceptable).

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;