1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 56,34,197, KRW 15,361,755, and each of the said money to Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) D is a freight truck of 22:58 to 22:59 E on March 7, 2013 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”). D is a freight truck of 25 tons E (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

In order to reduce the speed below the speed of 30 km per hour and stop the Defendant’s vehicle, while driving a road of two lanes of 92.8 km in the border of Yongcheon-si, Incheon Metropolitan City, which is located in the half of the border 92.8 km away from the Busan metropolitan bank, there was an error in the Defendant’s vehicle. In this case, the network F (hereinafter referred to as “the network”).

G 25 tons of cargo trucks (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”).

2) The Defendant’s vehicle was driven at approximately 500 meters later than the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Defendant’s vehicle was concealed as it was (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The deceased died due to multi-life damage, etc.) The deceased’s wife, the plaintiff B, and the plaintiff C are the deceased’s children, and the defendant entered into a mutual aid agreement with the intent to compensate for human and material damage arising during the operation of the defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 22 evidence and Eul 2 evidence (including paper numbers) and the whole purport of the pleading

B. According to the facts of recognition as the basis of liability, the defendant is the mutual aid business operator of the defendant's vehicle, and the accident of this case occurred due to the failure of the defendant's vehicle, which is the preceding vehicle, the defendant is responsible for compensating the deceased and the plaintiffs

In regard to this, the defendant was driving a vehicle with the taillights and the driver of the defendant's vehicle. D, the driver of the defendant's vehicle, took all measures to prevent the occurrence of the accident, such as sounding the horn, turning on the emergency lights, etc., so the accident in this case was caused by the negligence of the deceased. However, although the accident in this case was caused by the breakdown of the preceding vehicle on the expressway, the reason that the accident in this case was caused by the breakdown of the preceding vehicle was turned on the stern, etc., and the reason that the

It seems that it is only a litigation.