(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.12 2019가단5033206

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.12 2019가단5033206

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 35,00,00; (b) KRW 26,66,666; (c) KRW 21,66,666; and (d) KRW 21,66; and (c) KRW 666, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The F is a dump truck on January 31, 2019 (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 16:49 G 25 tons (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(i)The driving of a vehicle to drive a road in front of the Kuamamba 40-5 above that of the Guamba-ri in both sides at the south of the two weeks, drive the road in front of the Guamba-ri 40-5 above that of the Guamba-ri in the direction of K in the direction of the direction of the vehicle to the left by the negligence of violating the signal and making the left-hand turn.

2) The lower part of the left-hand side of the Defendant vehicle was shocked into the fuel tank installed on the right-hand side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) Around 17:37 of the same day, H died on the same day on the same day, and I died on the same day on the same day on the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “H. 3”) Plaintiff A is the deceased’s spouse, and Plaintiff B, C, and D are the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract against the Defendant’s vehicle. 【The ground for recognition” did not have any dispute, A’s evidence 1, 2, and 1 (including the number of pages)

each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant, as the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident of this case, unless there are special circumstances, since the deceased died due to the operation of the defendant vehicle.

C. The Defendant asserts that there was an error in boarding beyond the prescribed number, since the deceased operated the Plaintiff’s vehicle by burning after the deceased’s I.

A. As examined in the above A, although the deceased was found to have been on the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the accident of this case is that the driver of the Defendant vehicle is driving a strokely as seen earlier.

The left turn is generated by making a left turn in violation of the signal, to the driver of the defendant vehicle.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.15 2019나76391

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.11 2019나55233

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.22 2019가단2764

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.12 2019나20954

-서울서부지방법원 2016.08.18 2016가단215236