A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), in support of the Sung-nam branch of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment on September 30, 2016 became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On September 24, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document and the instant investigation document: (a) at the Defendant’s office located in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si; (b) made the Defendant enter the victim’s name and address in the delegation column of the power of attorney stating that “A”, “A, the power of attorney should be required to recover; and (c) made the victim enter the above person’s name and address in the delegation column of the authority to commission the preparation of a debt performance certificate at the D office of notary public, by designating the person as his/her agent; and (d) made the Defendant enter the above person’s name and address in the D office of notary public, “A,00,000,000,000,0000,000 won,” in the obligee column, “A,” “A,” in the obligor column,” “A,” in the cause for occurrence of the debt,” “C,” “The date of maturity,” and “10 years,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, has forged a letter of delegation in the name of C, a private document on rights and obligations and exercised it.

2. The Defendant is a person who operates a man-made wholesale and retail business with the trade name of “F”.

On September 2014, the Defendant stated that, at the office of the victim Braziln Co., Ltd. located in 250 as the wife population monopoly at the end of the time, the Defendant provided that, “on the face of supplying a man-made stone, the Defendant would have the employees in charge of the victim company provide joint and several sureties with respect to the existing product price liability of KRW 90,150,000 and pay the substitute payment,” and that, at the office of notary public under paragraph (1), the Defendant provided joint and several sureties with respect to KRW 90,150,000 for the C’s substitute seat price of KRW 90,150.”