logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.03.22 2016고단734
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In this case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40, at the main point of “E” located on the D7th floor of “E” in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, the Defendant: (b) took a bath over about 30 minutes to the victim F, who is an employee of the main shop; and (c) took a look at the said main point by avoiding disturbance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On April 10, 2016, the Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties was asked to the Cheongju District Police Station GJman in the Cheongju-gu Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the fact that there was a drinking problem at the drinking price, to H, who was called up, at the above main point around April 10, 2016.

D. The phrase “I” and the phrase “I,” the phrase “I,” and the defect of “I,” the phrase “I,” means, “I,” ;

Madar Madar for Police Officers

Along with this Chewing theory, the lower court: (a) committed assault, by hand, on the part of the said I in a manner such as pushing ahead of his breast, and driving his hair.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the dispatch of 112 reported reports.

Summary of Evidence

The application of laws and regulations of J to the police statements of the defendant F, I, and H

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution.

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines recommended for the sentencing guidelines: the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of punishment for multiple crimes (person with a special mitigation) in the mitigated area (one month to eight months) of the basic area (Interference with Duties) Nos. 1 (Interference with Duties), No. 2 (Interference with Duties) of the Act on the Punishment of Crimes (Interference with Duties), No. 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes (Interference with Execution of Duties), No. 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes (Interference with Execution of Duties): Six months to one year and eight months;

2. The fact that the decision of sentencing reflects the defendant's wrongness, that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant in agreement with the injured party F, and violence against the defendant.

arrow