A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 31, 2018, at the main point of the trade name “D” operated by the injured party C on the first floor of the B B building in Bupyeong-si, Bupyeong-si on July 31, 2018, on the ground that the injured party reported the smoking of the Defendant’s daily operation and demanded the withdrawal of the tobacco, the Defendant’s interference with the Defendant’s business refers to “Cals and v. N. k. k. k. k. k.

The victim interfered with the main business of the victim by force by avoiding disturbance, such as intending to take a bath, see sound, and see the beer and beer, etc.

2. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place and place as the above paragraph 1, refused to request the Defendant to return to the Defendant by the police officer F belonging to the Seocheon-gu Police Station E District, Seocheon-gu, U.S., who called to the site after having received 112 report that “I wish to take alcohol,” and the Defendant’s refusal to return to the Defendant.

C Hab Habk Hab Habk

“A police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the dispatch of reports and the maintenance of order, at the time of one time by sound and hand, at the same time interfered with the lower part of the F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each written statement of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the 112 Reporting Case List and work log;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1)(hereinafter referred to as the "disorder of Suspension of Execution") of the Criminal Act are as follows: 1 Crimes (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1)(hereinafter referred to as the "disorder of Suspension of Execution") [Scope of the Sentence] 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) and Crimes 2 (Obstruction of Duties) for the basic area (from June to one year and six months), 1 (Obstruction of Duties) for the basic area (for June to one year and one year and six months), the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple crimes for the basic area (for example, interference of Duties) (for six months to one year and six months): June to two years [Pronouncement Decision of Punishment]; Defendant interferes with his/her business at his/her main place and uniform.