The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant cannot find out the grounds for conviction against each of the facts charged and cannot find the facts charged by force.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won by fine) is excessively unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On January 15, 2013, the judgment of the court below and the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts is based on evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below and the trial court. In light of the following circumstances, i.e., the defendant stated that it was difficult for the police officer, who was a customer at the time, to escape from a disturbance at a restaurant; H, who was a police officer dispatched at the time, also made a statement that he was frighting at the time, while taking a bath for restaurant customers, can sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant interfered with D's restaurant business. Thus, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit. 2) The court below and the court below duly adopted the obstruction of performance of official duties and the injury, and recognized it based on evidence, which is recognized by the defendant's evidence that the police officer dispatched after receiving a report by the defendant 12, did not answer the circumstances of his report, and the defendant did not make an assault to the restaurant under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant did not answer the defendant's request for identification and identification of the cargo.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. Interference with and interference with business of April 14, 2013.