Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant, on January 2014, was the head of the Defendant’s office.

B by forging the power of attorney in the name of B, the above B was the joint guarantor with respect to the defendant's personal debt.

1. On January 22, 2014, the Defendant of the document forgery or the event of the above-mentioned document is, without authority, at a notary public D in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, a notary public D located in Mapo-gu, with a view to exercising, and without authority, the amount column using a visible pen on the proxy form; “E” and “B” in the lending column; “E” and “B” in the lending column; “2 January 22, 2014”; “30”, “30,” “the highest amount of debt guarantee”, “3” in the guarantee bond column; “B” in the guarantee bond column; and “B” in the name of the delegating.

B The letter of delegation in the name of private document B, which is a private document to prove facts, was forged, and the power of attorney was exercised as if the power of attorney was duly formed.

2. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant did not delegate to E a joint and several liability amounting to KRW 16,400,000 for the Defendant’s debt amounting to KRW 16,40,000 for the Defendant’s E at the time, place, and in fact, the Defendant prepared a fair certificate to the effect that B made the Defendant joint and several liability amounting to KRW 16,40,00 for the Defendant’s debt amounting to KRW 16,40,00 for the Defendant’s debt amounting to KRW 2.

Accordingly, the Defendant had F enter false facts in the certificate of monetary consumption and loan contract, which is the original copy of the deed, and around that time, had F keep the original copy of the deed at the place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A process deed;

1.The Kakao Stockholm Act and its content.