logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고정2145
폭행
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. At around 18:30 on August 18, 2016, Defendant A sought that the Defendant did not pay wages even after having worked for three days at both end-of-end Seoul Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Victim B (n, 39 years of age), Defendant A abused the victim, by hand, on the ground that the victim did not have “slick, cut off, and paid wages.”

B. Defendant B, at the above temporary location, assaulted the victim, such as flaging the victim’s eye, flaging the victim’s eye, flaging the victim’s eye, and flaging the victim’s eye.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act);

B. Withdrawal of expression of intent to punish victims after the prosecution of this case

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);

arrow