logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.27 2016누43154
독립유공자보훈급여금 수급대상자 재선정결정 취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The 5th of the first instance judgment shall be paid"; "the following persons" in Articles 13 and 14 shall be read as "one grandchild, etc. where all children are dead at the time of the first registration as bereaved family members of the person of distinguished services to national independence who died after August 15, 1945," and "living" in the sixth third part of the first instance judgment shall be read as "living" (the evidence submitted in the first instance court shall be considered as evidence and the facts finding and determination in the first instance court shall be deemed legitimate even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court shall be considered as the whole). Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow