1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of the judgment as to a part of the allegations that the plaintiff emphasizes at the court of first instance, and thus, all of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. It is interpreted that the bereaved family members of the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Service to Independence were excluded from the assertion.

Even if the plaintiff's attached J has been recognized as a bereaved family member of the person of distinguished services to the national independence since it had been prior to the enforcement of the former Act on the Persons of Distinguished Services to the national independence amended by Act No. 4457 of December 27, 191, and thus, the registration of bereaved family has already been made

Even if there are circumstances to consider the same as the completion of the bereaved family registration.

Therefore, in consideration of the equity with the bereaved family members of other persons of distinguished services to the national independence, the plaintiff who is the son of the national independence should be recognized as the bereaved family members

B. Article 5(1) of the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Services to Independence and the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Services to Independence lists the scope of the bereaved families or families of the persons of distinguished services to national independence who receive compensation pursuant to this Act only their spouses, children, grandchildren, and kins (the persons indicated in the rescue account before August 14, 1945). However, if their children and grandchildren were already deceased at the time of their initial registration under subparagraph 3, one of the nearest lineal descendants of the persons of distinguished services to national independence shall be

However, according to the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the Plaintiff constitutes a person of distinguished services to the national independence, who was ex post facto adopted by the first instance court, as a person of distinguished services to the national independence, and is a person of distinguished services to the national independence.

Furthermore, it is true that the plaintiff's attachedJ had already been registered as a bereaved family member of the person of distinguished services to the national independence or could be assessed equally as the plaintiff's assertion.