1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

After being appointed as a police officer on November 3, 2003, the Plaintiff was promoted to the police officer on December 1, 2010. From July 17, 2014 to November 10, 2015, the Plaintiff served as a patrol officer belonging to the Silung Police Station B police officer, and served as a police officer in the Silung Police Station C from November 11, 2015.

Grounds for Disciplinary Action

1. Habitual duty: From September 9, 2015, up to 07: 30 to 112 patrols up to 110: around 07:40 on the ground that he/she was dispatched to the 112 reported site of the larceny incident occurred at D gas stations on the same day and was in excess of the preceding day, he/she shall have his/her new police officer handle the larceny incident without getting out of the patrols on the 110th day, and from October 14, 2015 - up to 0: 14: 0-10-16: 00-112 patrols up to 0: 0: 20-2: 0-6: 00-6: 00-10: 10-6: 20-6: 00-10: 20-6: 00-10: 20-10,000-2: 20-10,000-1.

F. 11. (18:00 to 20:00, 20:00 to 22:00), the same

F. 12. (04:00~06:00), the same shall apply

B. On 16. (18:00-200, 22:00-24:00), 17. (04:00) of the same month (14:00-06:00), 24. (16:00) of the same month (14:0-16:00) and 26. (0) of the same month (0: 02:0-00, 04:0 to 06:00) of the same month other than the hours of duty, such as dispatch, etc., to stop 112 patrols in the vicinity of the drone, including the I, on 17 occasions in total, including mobile phone games, up to 112 patrols, up to 08:0-12 patrols up to 08:10-24:00 on 24, 2015, and up to 105:10-105:20 on 105:10-105:20 on 10.