1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,747,173 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 21, 2014 to November 18, 2016.

1. The Plaintiff is a pharmacist who operates a pharmacy in the name of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the trade name of “C pharmacy”.

The defendant is a company that operates the "E" village bus owned by the defendant, which is the following vehicles for traffic accidents.

On August 21, 2014, the F, who was affiliated with the defendant, driven the above vehicle on or around 22:58, and proceeded in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G from H school to I, in violation of the signal at speed of 50 to 60 km by one way between the seven-lanes at H school, and turned back to the right side of the J vehicle that was left left at the right side of the vehicle and turned back to the right side of the vehicle.

As a result, the plaintiff was destroyed by the above C Pharmacy.

The Co., Ltd., the insurer of the above village bus, paid KRW 25,370,000 to the Plaintiff, who is the operator, KRW 20 million on October 27, 2014, KRW 1.1 million on October 8, 2014, KRW 4.26 million on damage to the above C pharmacy, and paid KRW 25,370,000 on damage to the C pharmacy.

On September 4, 2014 and October 13, 2014, the above Mz fire and marine insurance paid a total of KRW 17.6 million in total, and KRW 2 million in the monthly security diagnosis of Co., Ltd. on October 13, 2014, KRW 200,000 to M, KRW 820,00 in N on October 14, 2014, KRW 1,252,00 in total for damage to the commercial building of the above C pharmacy.

이러한 물적 피해에 관하여 위 메리츠화재해상보험은 그 무렵 원고와 “乙(위 메리츠화재보험)은 甲(원고)의 피해물을 원상복구하여 주기로 하고 간접손해 및 기타 일체의 손해배상금으로 貳阡萬 원을 甲에게 지급한다”, “단, 나머지 손해된 금액에 대하여 별도 신곤운수 상대로 소제기 예정”이라는 조건으로 합의하고, 위 교통사고에 관한 일체의 권리를 상호 포기하며 여하한 사유가 있어도 민ㆍ형사상 소송이나 이의를 제기하지 아니할 것을 확인한다는 취지의...