beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 675,316 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from November 1, 2013 to April 3, 2015, and the next day.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The plaintiff is engaged in salt coloring business, and the defendant is a person who operates a direct product exporter with the trade name C.
B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant provided the original body exported by the Defendant from April 2013 to October 2013 of the same year to the Plaintiff, and upon the request for salt color, the Plaintiff supplied the original body in color, and the Defendant traded by calculating the processing fee on a monthly basis by the method of paying the Plaintiff for the following month.
C. Upon the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff colored the original base and supplied the original base amount equivalent to KRW 24,675,316 on July 2013, 201, KRW 21,425,982 on September 2013, and KRW 21,421,076 on October 2013.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is identical to KRW 675,316 out of the processing fees for July 2013, as the Plaintiff seeks, as the Plaintiff seeks.
u.10.The sum of 21,421,076. 22,096,392, and any delay interest thereon, shall be payable.
3. Judgment on the defendant's defense
A. The Defendant’s assertion 1 on July 2013, 2013 defense against the processing fees for the portion 1) occurred, among the direct substances exported in the United States by the Plaintiff in chrofing, that was due to chrofed salting, and the Defendant paid only the remainder to the Defendant after deducting the sum of USD 1,195.49 from the total export price for the above direct substances. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to bear half of the sum of USD 1,195.49 against the sum of the Crofing for the broging material. The Plaintiff’s total sum of the processing fees for the broging material was settled by deducting KRW 25,675,316 from the sum of the processing fees for the broging material. The Defendant paid the remainder to the Plaintiff on July 2013, and then completed the settlement of the processing fees for the 24,000,000 won to the Plaintiff on July 36, 2013.